‘After nearly annihilating our world, our relatives are allies’: a thrilling podcast featuring JFK and Khrushchev’s descendants.

During October 1962, the planet veered closer toward ruin more so than ever during recent history. This transpired following the discovery that an American reconnaissance plane discovered that Soviet nuclear missile sites were being assembled in the island of Cuba, a mere 100 miles off the coast of the US mainland. In response, President JFK commanded the US Navy’s Sixth Fleet to establish a maritime blockade around Cuba. What followed constituted almost two weeks filled with impossible stress.

The Unthinkable Threat

The peril remained palpable. If Kennedy, or else the Russian opposite, Nikita Khrushchev, initiated an attack against the other side, a cascade involving global atomic strikes followed by counterstrikes would have followed, thrusting mankind toward all-out destruction.

This pivotal 1962 event has been examined repeatedly, in books, movies, and TV documentaries. However, for its third season, a prominent audio documentary series titled "The Bomb" has brought an unprecedented perspective into this historical narrative. It is co-presented by Max Kennedy alongside Nina Khrushcheva, relatives belonging to the figures who, for two tense weeks, controlled the fate of humanity within their grasp.

"What was the Kremlin planning? What were the American side planning?" questions Khrushcheva, Khrushchev’s great-granddaughter who is also an academic specializing in international affairs.

For her, the beauty of the show is its endeavor to question: "Why do individuals detest each other and confront each other?"

"It was not lost on me how profound the fact that people can be friends or else can become complete adversaries," adds Kennedy, the son of Robert Kennedy, related to JFK and currently an author and lawyer. "History shows this dynamic over and over when nations have gone to war, highlighting the profound irrationality involved to fight."

A Precipice Towards Disaster

What’s striking regarding the Cuban missile crisis was that, since it unfolded so publicly, citizens globally could watch nearly in real time as it crept towards disaster. However, the danger of annihilation was more imminent than what most people understood at the time.

"Almost all officials among Kennedy's advisors wanted a military strike and an invasion," explains Kennedy. "If we had attacked the Cubans with the Sixth Fleet, it is certain the Russians stationed there would have launched a nuclear warhead against the US Sixth Fleet, and that would have destroyed the naval vessels and destroyed our primary naval force. And, the U.S. would have retaliated with massive retaliation which would have eradicated most life on the planet."

The fact this did not occur stands as credit to Kennedy and Khrushchev, who succeeded in remain calm and engaging in diplomacy when hawkish elements in their governments were advocating military action. As a result, The Soviet premier removed the nuclear weapons from Cuba and President Kennedy (a fact not publicly disclosed at the time) removed American similar weapons based in Turkey. The relief was palpable, as was a feeling of optimism.

The Different Viewpoint

Yet, during those 13 days in October, the tension was palpable by everyone. The podcast's co-hosts were born in the years following these events, and Khrushcheva being taught about it via the USSR's education system, which portrayed a slightly different picture of what happened.

"You said your father remembers it, describing it as a scary day," she says. "However for Soviet citizens, people really didn’t know a great deal regarding the crisis, because it was a crisis, and under the Soviet system we were told that everything was always fine and positive."

Within Khrushchev’s family, however, the perspective was distinct. "I was informed that it was a triumphant occasion it was, as it was eyeball to eyeball. The leaders managed to resolve it, thus avoided a global war, seen as a positive outcome," she adds. In the years to come, however, that interpretation was not shared by all Russians. "For decades within Russian historical analysis, the crisis was viewed as a defeat for Khrushchev, because he didn’t blow up the United States."

An Unprecedented Partnership

The Bomb is remarkably even-handed , expertly crafted that Khrushcheva quips it almost made her forget the known the ending. This effect is, partly, thanks to the participation of renowned scholars. Yet, really, the most significant thing is the participation of the descendants. Not so long ago, it was unthinkable for relatives of the heads of state of America and the Soviet Union would appear together publicly. That Max Kennedy and Nina Khrushcheva can do that, and exhibit such warmth toward one another, has to be a symbol of hope.

"Max and I aren't the first," smiles Khrushcheva. "After 1991, my uncle Sergey Khrushchev’s son and formed a close bond with Dwight Eisenhower’s children."

"But we were strangers before the podcast," adds Kennedy. "That is unfortunate since we connected immediately and now we’re friends, which is really great. Finally, following almost six decades since almost destroying the world, our families have become allies, suggesting global relations is safer, somewhat."

Contemporary Parallels and Current Perils

Or is it? One reason why The Bomb feels so necessary is that we now are living in a perilous era. The symbolic clock of doom stands nearer to catastrophe in its history, partly since world leaders appear not to be able to grasp

Julia Cherry MD
Julia Cherry MD

Lena is a passionate content curator and community manager with over a decade of experience in online forums and collaborative knowledge platforms.